frail213 Posted June 4, 2011 Report Share Posted June 4, 2011 Am I the only person who finds PS3 games way too short? I mean it is Blu-rayafter all! It has 2-3 times the size of what the xbox 360 disk format has, so why are the games the same length or if not shorter than the xbox 360 games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
† The Joker Posted June 4, 2011 Report Share Posted June 4, 2011 It depends on the type of games you play. Some have been incredibly short, but others are massive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frail213 Posted June 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2011 It depends on the type of games you play. Some have been incredibly short, but others are massive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sham Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 stop playing games with no longetivity! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koby Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 God of war 3 can be used as an example, I beat it in 10-12 hour's. Now let's look at gears of war 2 (xbox 360) I beat it in 8-10 hour's. How is it that an xbox 360 game be almost as long as a PS3 game. PS3 uses Blu-ray (25-50 GB) and xbox 360 uses Dual Layered DVD (8-15 GB). It gives PS3 game developer's 2-3 time's if not more space than an xbox 360 game to fit a massive amount of extra stuff to the game. I personally find it useless for the PS3 to use Blu-ray format in its games, if the game's are just as long or not shorter than an xbox 360's game (which has a far more limited amount of space).The discs are bigger yes, but so is the games data. Length of a game has little to do with the space used. The fact that the game is truly rendered in HD means a whole lot compared to the SD resolution of the 360 games.Take video files on the internet for example. A dual-audio 480p file ripped from DVD can usually be under 250 MB. That same episode in 1080p ripped from the Blu-ray is usually over 1GB.It's the same formula with the games. Just because you play both for 10 hours to beat it and one is on Blu-ray and one is on DVD does not mean they aren't using up the full disc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoshi Mushi Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 God of war 3 can be used as an example, I beat it in 10-12 hour's. Now let's look at gears of war 2 (xbox 360) I beat it in 8-10 hour's. How is it that an xbox 360 game be almost as long as a PS3 game. PS3 uses Blu-ray (25-50 GB) and xbox 360 uses Dual Layered DVD (8-15 GB). It gives PS3 game developer's 2-3 time's if not more space than an xbox 360 game to fit a massive amount of extra stuff to the game. I personally find it useless for the PS3 to use Blu-ray format in its games, if the game's are just as long or not shorter than an xbox 360's game (which has a far more limited amount of space). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnawind Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 Lol, I beat God of War III in 9hours. But, it was worth my playing once through. As Joker said, some games are long, while others are massively long, E.G. Naruto Ultimate Ninja Storm 2 was 21hrs, but they made you play for 30hrs for a trophy. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
† Ferocia Coutura Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 Just because a game is short doesn't mean that it is a bad game. Assassin's Creed games are short, but they are very good games!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shade_13 Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 Just because a game is short doesn't mean that it is a bad game. Assassin's Creed games are short, but they are very good games!!!AC is short? You must be playing through them pretty fast ;D I wish they were short, because the gameplay becomes a little repetitive before you reach the finale. But they're working on it and it gets better with each game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoshi Mushi Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 AC is short? You must be playing through them pretty fast ;D I wish they were short, because the gameplay becomes a little repetitive before you reach the finale. But they're working on it and it gets better with each game.I agree with Shade, AC wasnt short at all.. and it gets utterly hard at the end.. another Long game is... FFXIII, took me 80hrs to beat the story, and 118hrs to beat the final boss without dying. XD Quite long.. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgogeto Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 well the games are the same on ps3 and xbox but ps3 has blueRay and people that make game wants to make more money so they try to make the game in small GB. so it fits in xbox but games that came out only on ps3 r much longer and the quality of the game is much better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edder Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 Not one of the GOW games have ever been long at all. But it has always been worth playing and worth your time. the Final Fantasy series is the perfect games to get if you want a long game. i played a game a few years ago, cant remember what it was called, think blue dragon. didnt get very good ratings, but i really enjoyed it for many many hours (+-80). so it all depends on what games you play... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyon Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 When Final Fantasy Vs. XIII comes out, since its PS3 only, it'll be a kickass game. Both graphics wise, and how long and how much is in the story and game itself. P.S. Japan is working on a 1TB Blu-Ray disc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now