Jump to content

Which do you prefer FMA or FMA Brotherhood?


samurai_lord

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Brotherhood. I couldn't stand the direction that Bones decided to take the Homunculi in for the first anime, specifically with how to kill them. Forcing them into contact with the "original person" then being able to kill them not only makes NO sense, but it also violates the law of Equivalent Exchange relating to their healing completely. The Manga/Brotherhood method is consistent with the established rules, especially when you know that a Philosophers' Stone is basically condensed soul energy, which is used to fuel an energy-mass conversion, which is simply deeper physics and consistent with the rules, as matter has both particle and wave properties, and energy can then logically be used to combine bits of matter in the air and "freeze" energy into matter, allowing a sufficient supply of material to be provided for the regeneration. You don't have enough energy left to heal, you die. You can't make the equivalent exchange, you lose the benefit. That consistency with the series rules combined with the manga and Brotherhood's idea of trying to keep moving on forward and learn from past mistakes to grow and become stronger is more satisfying than watching more and more s*** pile up onto the party, screwing the mechanics of alchemy until death becomes something akin to a bungee jump or a see-saw.

What FMA does is pseudo-science. It's made up science, therefore what they wrote, passes as a scientific law in that universe. You're always going to fail at explaining a fictional magical theory as a scientific law as it relates to OUR universe. What you wrote up there is you trying to explain alchemy using our scientific principles, but fail, because alchemy doesn't work and doesn't exist in our world.

Besides, if I recall correctly, what happens when a homunculus gets too close to the bones of the person who was intended to be resurrected...is a psychological issue, that then causes physical damage to them.

Plus I don't get where you're coming from with death is like a bungee jump or a see-saw. Characters that died in the FMA universe died. They never came back. The homunculi retained some memories, yes, look at Sloth and Lust, but that is not to say that Sloth = Trisha Elric. The only time in the original FMA anime that someone actually came back to life was Edward, and that was only accomplished when Al used his Philosopher's Stone: and even with the Stone, Al was still taken to the gate (whether this then counts as Al "dying" or not is debatable).

In my opinion, I hated what happened in Brotherhood, in that they introduce Alchemy and spend a load of time talking about it, explaining its rules and intricacies...and then introduce Alkahestry, and just say it "uses the life-force of the earth". They never explain why you have to throw daggers into a pattern in order to use it or anything else about it. It's also a plot-hole in how it was conceived in the first place - Hohenheim is said to be the man who introduced it, but everything he knew, he was taught by Father...and yet Father at no point seems to have any knowledge of Alkahestry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Both the original series and the Brotherhood series are awesome. They are definitely worth watching. But if some one asks me which one I prefer I would probably go with the Brotherhood series. The Brotherhood series follows the original series after all. I know that there are some people who say that it's the emotions, dialogues, etc that count and I agree with them. But the biggest factor here is the storyline. Let's say someone changes the original storyline of your favorite movie. In this remake the story is not perfect but there's way more emotion, better dialogues, better fight scene. Will u accept it? I don't think so. It's the story which counts first. Sure, more emotion can make an anime better but sacrificing the original story for that is something I cannot agree with. For that reason I pick the Brotherhood series. Don't misunderstand me. The original series is awesome but nothing beats the original storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say Brotherhood, because it stays truer to the manga and to the spirit of it- while the first has too much darkness, very western.

As for the beginning... yes they rushed it. I found that after Briggs is when they started to slow down and show the characters much more and better. By the Promised Day (which got 11 episodes IIRC) pretty much all the flaws are gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say Brotherhood, because it stays truer to the manga and to the spirit of it-

If the spirit of the manga is to have no emotion, then we were better off with the original series that didn't follow the manga. These shows that seem to follow the manga closer seem to be worse than the original shows. It's like the animators simply try to animate the manga panels frame to frame and forget everything else. There is no depth, no emotion, no shadowing, and the plot seems rushed, generic, and cliched. Hunter x Hunter remake suffers the exact same way FMAB did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the spirit of the manga is to have no emotion, then we were better off with the original series that didn't follow the manga. These shows that seem to follow the manga closer seem to be worse than the original shows. It's like the animators simply try to animate the manga panels frame to frame and forget everything else. There is no depth, no emotion, no shadowing, and the plot seems rushed, generic, and cliched. Hunter x Hunter remake suffers the exact same way FMAB did.

I agree! FMAB feels rushed and emotionless...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In