Chronos 117 Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 By now everyone should have played both Reach and Black Ops it's to to see which is better. Please tell which is your favorite and why it is your favorite. Personally I say Reach is more fun because there's more to do. The Firefight is much better than ODST's Firefight, Forge gives you much more freedom to customize, and finally the armor ability's and new weapons that completely change the way you play Halo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasoivc Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 I can't honestly really say one is better than the others, kind of like a typical PS3 vs X360 arguement; I own both yet I appreciate both for what they are. Although I tip my hat towards Black Ops because that's about the only game my friends have nowadays since they trade in their games to buy new games (Something I would never do, ever; unless the game was horrendous.)I think Firefight is almost equivalent to Zombies and Forge/Custom Private Matches are almost the same as well. Now as to content and what you can do, that may be different because in Reach you can probably create your "own" gametype per say using an outline from a regular game like Team Slayers, but theoretically you can do that for Black Ops as well.I believe Reach is more a "for fun" game while Black Ops is just a pick me up run'n'gun. Both are excellent games for almost anyone, laid back or serious. Either way, I don't have money to buy map packs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shunsuke Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 Black Ops. I played Reach for about 20 mins and its the same as all the other games just in a new box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coro Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 I vote for halo, i think Black OPS is not what it should be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saizu Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 i played both of them but COD: black ops is much better than Halo Reach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloodControl½ Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 sci fi wars ftw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilwill00 Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 I own both of them and I would rather play Black Ops than Reach. I play alot better on black ops than Reach & some of you know how I do on Reach.. I like them both don't get me wrong not putting Reach down.. I collect games and the ones I get will be collectors edition if their is the option for it and Reach is one of them but still like I said, I like to play Black Ops before Reach.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trend Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 (Multiplayer)Its really hard to compare both games because the gameplay in each game is very different. Yes they are both FPS' but black ops gameplay is more about customizing your characters weapons/perks/killstreaks and has a more "lonewolf" style gameplay(which I like). Halo reach, on the otherhand, centers more on a teamwork style gameplay and that is when its the most fun, which is why playing by yourself in the game can get quite dull at times. Although if you get a group together halo reach is deffinitally one of the funnest games out there especially with all the custom forge/gametypes available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apr118 Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 CoD is more realistic so it is very helpful for soldiers whereas Halo is more Science Fiction. As a gamer, I enjoy the unrealistic and exaggerated things so I voted for Halo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkandea Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 I feel that Black Ops and all CoD games tend to have a very throwaway feel to your characters life... knife stabs are insta kills and it is far easier to die in CoD then Halo. This creates the sense that preserving your life is pointless and people instead just try to get as many kills as possible.... just my opinion but Reach is a bit less insane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lokisminion Posted February 16, 2011 Report Share Posted February 16, 2011 I'd say Halo Reach is a more substantial game, but I like the zombie maps a ton on Black Ops so its tough for me to pick. Purely based on which I end up playing more I'd go with Black Ops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malarath Posted February 17, 2011 Report Share Posted February 17, 2011 I prefered Halo Reach, bits in Black Ops became very frustrating with infinitly respawning enemies e.g. tunnels after you blow up the rocket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
†Anras Rune Posted February 18, 2011 Report Share Posted February 18, 2011 I voted for halo...but then again ive always been a huge halo fan. Ive played black ops at ma friends house a few times but i find the game lacking. To me it just seems like a copy of mw2 and didnt deserve the hype...so much in fact that i havent even bought the game which is saying something for me as i buy all the good fps games i can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idl12 Posted February 18, 2011 Report Share Posted February 18, 2011 Well I'll make my judgements based on the single player, Black Ops was awesome in single player, I can't think of a single mission that didn't have me interested and pumped, plus the mindfuck at the end was nice to. As for reach, The single player is good, It's just that I could never get used to the 360's controller,(played it by my friend btw since I don't own a 360) so yeah, the missions were entertaining but it just missed some of the raw, deadly fell that black ops had(I may be biased since I didn't actually finish reach) Though the main thing I like about black ops more than reach, it came out for the Pc, Reach didn't, I suck at online shooters when I'm on consoles. So black ops wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-kwan155 Posted February 19, 2011 Report Share Posted February 19, 2011 Argh, you know this one was pretty hard. I love both games equally, because they both have their own features that give them great merit. I do have post my fave out of the two, and that would be Halo Reach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max465 Posted February 19, 2011 Report Share Posted February 19, 2011 I haven't played Black Ops and I never will. After two bad games(WaW, MW2) I have officially stopped playing CoD. The Multiplayer has been turned to shit and as gamer who plays games more for the Multiplayer experience that is a big deal for me. I don't care how good the single player is, no matter how much I like it, it will get boring. As for Multiplayer never gets boring for me. From what I heard from friends the Multiplayer system in Black Ops is the same as the Multiplayer in MW2. The Multiplayer in CoD: Modern Warfare 2 was unbalanced, if you played the game longer, you had the better guns. That didn't make sense to me? Everyone should have the same opportunity for guns. I like what Reach did as an award system. You get Armor abilities and new Voices for Firefight. Things that are a fun addition to the game, but don't majorly make a difference in actual gameplay.Reach is just a better game than CoD anyways. The fights last longer and I just feel like I get more out of the game. On top of that, Reach has completely different abilities added to the game that the previous ones didn't have. While all I can tell from Black Ops is that they've made new levels with a few new guns, but the gameplay itself is the same.Vote: Halo: Reach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slaverukia Posted February 19, 2011 Report Share Posted February 19, 2011 black ops. halo is a fun multiplayer...but thats just all it is, a multiplayer game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SegaAnime Posted February 28, 2011 Report Share Posted February 28, 2011 sorry hand down to halo black ops too esay puls with black ops if u use a sipre's like me need to arm a lil up for a head shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umerth Posted March 1, 2011 Report Share Posted March 1, 2011 I would choose Reach over Black Ops. I've played both and I like them both but the enemy diversity in Halo has always been refreshing. Not to mention Grifball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kobe Posted March 1, 2011 Report Share Posted March 1, 2011 i can't say because I like both for what the bring to the table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now