JohnFlower Posted July 13, 2014 Report Share Posted July 13, 2014 I don't buy el-cheapo motherboards, so I cant help you here. I will say that I buy Asus, always Asus, and nothing but Asus (for motherboards). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljonesj Posted July 13, 2014 Report Share Posted July 13, 2014 id say asus and gigabyte for motherboards and its strange that asutek is actually parent name for asus but i hear bad names on asutek boards but great on asus ? dont ask me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeroPenguins Posted July 13, 2014 Report Share Posted July 13, 2014 Well what Koby said was kinda misleading about FPS. Depends on what type of encoder, what filters, what plugins, etc etc etc For example I can brag I can encode over 500FPS as well using my GPU. As I last recall, Nvidia has dedicated x264 hardware encoder so it should be blazing fast on paper... Eh, with MeGUI and multithreading with no filters or with handbrake which can multithread by default... Anyhow; with a fully scripted avisynth script full of slow filters and multithreading I get around 35fps. While without multithreading with the same filter script I'd get around 2-4 fps. So it's still a big difference between multithreading and not. There is likely to be faster filters available now then what I use though because I haven't updated stuff in a few years. Oh maybe I should've quoted what he meant, he was saying how it was 100X faster than Intel's. That was misleading, not what multithreading can achieve. But true, what you said is the whole point about multithreading and why parallelism is so popular now days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluerGost Posted July 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2014 Well what Koby said was kinda misleading about FPS. Depends on what type of encoder, what filters, what plugins, etc etc etc For example I can brag I can encode over 500FPS as well using my GPU. As I last recall, Nvidia has dedicated x264 hardware encoder so it should be blazing fast on paper... Eh, with MeGUI and multithreading with no filters or with handbrake which can multithread by default... Anyhow; with a fully scripted avisynth script full of slow filters and multithreading I get around 35fps. While without multithreading with the same filter script I'd get around 2-4 fps. So it's still a big difference between multithreading and not. There is likely to be faster filters available now then what I use though because I haven't updated stuff in a few years. Oh maybe I should've quoted what he meant, he was saying how it was 100X faster than Intel's. That was misleading, not what multithreading can achieve. But true, what you said is the whole point about multithreading and why parallelism is so popular now days. parallelism!!?? I dont know what that is. I dont think he said it is 100X faster than Intel. I did mention 100X but I was comparing it with my CPU Can Encoding video benefit from multi-threading?? AM I wrong or does AMD uses 8-psical core but only 4 processing unit - 1 containing 2 cores?? About Nvidia I get confused about their Product serials. The GTX 700 series is after the 600 series right & newest one is Titan . But why everywhere in net I see ppl hyped up about their GTX 600/500(especially GTX 680) GPU. I mean GTX 700 series & AMD R9 270x is much better than then right ?? I really wish My CPU could encode faster. Sony Vegas doesnt take mkv container so I have to Encode it into mkv to mp4 container which takes was too much time. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koby Posted July 13, 2014 Report Share Posted July 13, 2014 I really wish My CPU could encode faster. Sony Vegas doesnt take mkv container so I have to Encode it into mkv to mp4 container which takes was too much time. :/ encoding just to switch containers is stupid. Remux that shit instead. Takes only a couple seconds to remux a mkv into mp4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluerGost Posted July 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2014 (edited) I really wish My CPU could encode faster. Sony Vegas doesnt take mkv container so I have to Encode it into mkv to mp4 container which takes was too much time. :/ encoding just to switch containers is stupid. Remux that shit instead.Takes only a couple seconds to remux a mkv into mp4. I dont know how. Teach me man tech me now Edited July 13, 2014 by bluergost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeroPenguins Posted July 13, 2014 Report Share Posted July 13, 2014 parallelism!!?? I dont know what that is. I dont think he said it is 100X faster than Intel. I did mention 100X but I was comparing it with my CPU Can Encoding video benefit from multi-threading?? AM I wrong or does AMD uses 8-psical core but only 4 processing unit - 1 containing 2 cores?? No I mean you! You suggested it was 100X faster, so I wanted to clear that up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluerGost Posted July 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2014 parallelism!!?? I dont know what that is. I dont think he said it is 100X faster than Intel. I did mention 100X but I was comparing it with my CPU Can Encoding video benefit from multi-threading?? AM I wrong or does AMD uses 8-psical core but only 4 processing unit - 1 containing 2 cores?? No I mean you! You suggested it was 100X faster, so I wanted to clear that up. Ya I did but I was comparing my AMD-6100fx with his AMD-8150fx which is he saying gets 400fps/10(mine)=100fps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megas88 Posted July 14, 2014 Report Share Posted July 14, 2014 I'm just wondering. Why not just build a desktop for half the price? The only pricy part would be an intel processor. Or you could go cheaper with AMD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluerGost Posted July 14, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 14, 2014 I'm just wondering. Why not just build a desktop for half the price? The only pricy part would be an intel processor. Or you could go cheaper with AMD. I quite didnt get what you said. But in my currency AMD 8350 maybe around 18k & Intel i5 4670k is maybe around 21k. 1USD=80 in My currency. So, I dont think it that much different. I saw a couple of benchmark between this two & intel seem to give overall performance. Much better in Single core & even in multicore not that far behind AMD. In some review like Linus Tech he said seeing how more & more soft & game are starting to support Multi Thread AMD might support better in future. But well its in future & even in multicore workload intel performed almost the same except for Encoding. Also most ppl use intel for editing & say it gives better performance. Which is true for i7 but dont know how much its true for i5. Ya you could buy PC with half the price.But if you are planing on video editing & such you need a good PC to back you up & if you want good PC no mater what you chose wither its AMD/Intel its gona cost more. But I am still not sure which one performs better in Video Editing between 8350/4670k. Wonder what AMD will do when Intel releases its 8core. maybe they will release 16core which comes with built in AC requirement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljonesj Posted July 14, 2014 Report Share Posted July 14, 2014 that is one thing amd needs to get under control is their thermals even the new apus are hot running if u get the a10 versions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnFlower Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 AMD already has a 16 core processor, while Intel is at 15 + HT. Just thought I'd point that out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluerGost Posted July 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 AMD already has a 16 core processor, while Intel is at 15 + HT. Just thought I'd point that out. Ohh didnt knew that Does it come with a built in AC requirement ?? What HT stands for ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljonesj Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 hyper threading it makes it act like it has more cores than it does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now