Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
jose408

MW3

Recommended Posts

Modern Warefare 3 Was kind of disappointing to me because the graphics werent that good but thats my opinion and you die with just two shots whats up with that. So i think black ops is still better. But thats my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Modern Warefare 3 Was kind of disappointing to me because the graphics werent that good but thats my opinion and you die with just two shots whats up with that. So i think black ops is still better. But thats my opinion.

Agreed however in cod games online u pretty much always die in 2 shots even if they get you in the leg or arm quite odd if you ask me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i loved the story and online but online sort of became old after a while ( KD 2.50)and noobs started to be in every game the storys A.I are no use in vet and the enemy know where you are and kills in 1 sec flat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gave MW3 a 7/10 just because IW+Sledgehammer shoveled out exactly what MW2 was, plus or minus a few tweaks to the multiplayer aspect.

I don't know how anyone can complain about the graphics, a console game is limited to the console's performance. It can't look any better because

A) The Xbox is at its limits,

or

B)Your T.V. just plain sucks ass.

Being the third title in the *Modern Warfare* Series, we can expect some new and some old game concepts as a result of being the successor in the series. No doubt, the story to the trilogy is finished, the multiplayer is still quite very much the same yet fresh for this day in the year.

We have some old Killstreaks; We also have some new Killstreaks. What I find great about MW3's for it's multiplayer system is the Killstreak Packages. Assault, Support, and Specialist. Now the game doesn't strictly cater to people whom go on endless "Killamanjaros" or "Rampage" Series. It actually eases the pain of passive/support-style players and allows them to get in on the action. Not everyone goes 25-0 in a match, but a hell of a lot of people can manage 14 kills in one match to call in a Stealth Bomber.

@OP's opinion about bullet lag/game lag/etc/etc. I honestly don't know why you even bother complaining about something that silly. It's as if you've never played Call of Duty -online- in any of the games within the franchise. I don't know about you, but I've always died to maybe 2-3 bullets connecting with my character/model's body. I've always died to a grenade too without a Explosives Resistance Perk on. I've died to a lot of air support too. Yeah, lets just make it so everyone can take a -FULL- & -ACCURATE- Magazine to the head before they can die. Boy, that'd make the game fun. Lets make everyone a Juggernaut, that'd make the game REAL fun /endSarcasm.

I am completely content with MW3. It may not best the Original MW, or MW2, Black Ops, or even World At War, but it sure as hell keeps me busy for the few hours in life that I have to waste on video games inbetween work and classes.

-------------------------

Edit: There you go, a constructive post to a great game. Took me maybe 10 minutes to think about my rant and my experiences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i think black ops is still better

That's exactly why you think it's bad. MW3 is supposed to be a Modern Warfare, where Black Ops is a COD. The difference is, there was an entirely different team working on Black Ops, so things were different. After playing COD4, MW2, Black Ops, and MW3, I can safely say that Black Ops was directed in a different way.

Black Ops was much, much easier compared to MW2 - you could take more bullets, you could hip-fire with an AR and get easy kills, "pre-firing", the list goes on. It was a much less tactical game, and more run-and-gun. Yes, MW2 was also very much run-and-gun, and in some aspects more so than Black Ops, but Black Ops was very run-and-gun.

The people who actually stuck around for Black Ops have been spoiled by it. They're spoiled by the easiness of it, and once MW3 hits, which is supposed to be a harder game (in terms of multiplayer), they don't like it. Suddenly their tactics that they used in Black Ops get them closer to death.

Now, I do have an issue with MW3. A lot of issues, actually, and it's not lag. I've got a horrible connection that is slow in general and then gives me large lag spikes every few minutes. The issue that I have, generally, involve the community. I don't mean the people who go on mic and call people faggots. I actually think that's hilarious. No, it's the way people play.

I've played a lot of MW2 in my time (~100 hours) and not to brag, I'm good at it. The way people play MW2 and MW3 is completely different. In MW2, people usually played the objective and played tactically. They would shoot down air support, defend flags, help people. They wouldn't care as much about kills, their KDR, or getting those high killstreaks. Some of them did, but the people I manged to group with didn't.

In the few hours that I could stand playing Black Ops, I've noticed that very few people shoot down air support, camp, don't go after objectives, and worry about their KDR and getting those killstreaks. I complained about this earlier today, actually. In MW3, I have a .66 Win/Loss. Why is it so low? I like to play objective games, mainly Domination and Kill Confirmed (I've completely given up on Demolition). Every game I'll get people who sit back and camp. I'm fine with camping if they're locking down a flag and defending it. I'm guilty of doing that myself. But they're not doing that. They're sitting away from objectives, pointing at high traffic areas waiting for that "leet" headshot they can put in their montage.

I had a game the other day, a Kill Confirmed game, where people constantly walked right passed tags for our team, and of course, we lost because of it. I've had games of Domination where someone will sit right beside an enemy flag, not capping it, but waiting for someone else to go cap it so the enemy come rushing to it's aid so they can get those kills.

I like a lot of other things about this game. I love the killstreaks, and the variety of them. I personally only use Support and Specialist (usually Specialist). The maps, while not horrible, could be better, but that's only if I'm defending something and not rushing. For rushing, however, these maps are lovely. Rushing with Dead Silence and a silenced weapon? Yes please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's exactly why you think it's bad. MW3 is supposed to be a Modern Warfare, where Black Ops is a COD. The difference is, there was an entirely different team working on Black Ops, so things were different. After playing COD4, MW2, Black Ops, and MW3, I can safely say that Black Ops was directed in a different way.

For rushing, however, these maps are lovely. Rushing with Dead Silence and a silenced weapon? Yes please.

You're post was so full of win, everyone that views this thread and reads your post has just gained one intelligence point as a result.

Black Ops and MW3 are definitely two different games especially because of that "different developers/publishers" concept. Black Ops as you put it, being more run and gun, is just alike World At War. The only thing to ever worry about is "Tanks" and "AC-130s" or "Chopper Gunners." Wait. there aren't any of those in Black Ops, and it's been so long since I played I can't remember if it even had a AC-130-type of kill streak.

And personally, I hate Quicksnipers with a burning vengeance. If they haven't already shot me with their shitty trigger fingers, they're already filled with lead at the opposite end of my smoking barrel.

However arguably the community that is in MW3 as you put it, is the same community from Black Ops; they just don't shoot anything down when it comes to enemy support. It's incredibly stupid how prevalent it is because I have a similiar W/L ratio as well as a result of it. My KDR isn't that great, but it's greater than the dumbass camping off to the side way away from the flags. 1.74? Way better than 0.46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Activision, with all the money they make, still aint able to make a decent game, Activision gave trust to Sledgehammer games in hoping that it would make a difference, but all they did was focus on the menus, hopefully Sledgehammers own CoD would be cool, saying that they are making an MMO for CoD, I dont know if they are making it as a spin off or a Individualized game, as if to say the game wont have any similarities with Treyarch or Infinity ward's MW3 or Zombies and what not, I was hoping that when leveling up your gun, it would become more accurate or the stopping power would indrease but it didnt, all it does is unlock attachments and skins, the maps are too damn easy, I'll already know where somebodies at right at the beginning of the match, on top of that I hate people with mics so glad that you could mute the a-holes. Altogether I give it a 6.5/10 Multiplayer experience is good and all but its kinda getting old, Campaign: I've been looking forward to what Makarov had in store for the world, And finally Special Ops mode: my god finally something that makes sense in what they are doing for CoD, a Survival Mode, hey wait-up this is all too familiar... didnt Treyarch beat them to it? oh no wait these guys can shoot you instead of devour your brain, naw just kidding its actually decent for what it gives, I like the delta team force that aids you in your battle of survival its soo badass. the A.I. kinda sux but at least you have somebody to back you up. Graphics: The SAME!!! why aint they making any changes to it? Animations: The least they can do is fill it in, I mean when I see somebody laying down to dodge your bullets it looks kinda choppy, like something is missing, Overall: Blah blah blah lets just play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You die fast, cause you die fast in real life. And graphics don't mean shit as long as the games good. But that's just my opinion. : ]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the game would have been perfect in my eyes if there where no deathstreaks the striker/akimbo secondarys where nerft and lag compensation was no more and replaced by deticaded servers.

but thats not the case(COD4 is still the best COD to date). and graphics dude the game still needs to run at 60fps on a 6/7 year old console. and BF3 looks like shit on the current gen consoles compared to PC if you played BF3 once on PC you will be frutraded how bad it plays on consoles and I shit you not becuase I got both versions

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/user/Lord0Link/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MW3 wasn't TERRIBLE by any means, it is a game series with a new game every year after all, but it does lack quite a bit of trying new things. I think the most they did for this game was add Survival and a new killstreak system, but Survival is just Zombies with guns and the new killstreak system isn't that revolutionary compared to the previous one. MW3 is a decent game and I try not to bash on it too much because other people do enjoy it and you have to admit it can be pretty enjoyable at times. Overall though it feels like it was sub-par of what I expected from the beginning of such a great series. I have high hopes for Black Ops 2 for whatever reason....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...